Friday, February 3, 2012

Expect Us!





Expect Us!

Heretic Productions brings you an extraordinary piece of Poetry by Bill Allyn. "Expect Us."

Expect Us

Once we were weak; but now we stand tall.
Millions of citizens, heeding the call.
Demanding our freedom, the birthright of all.
The Arab Spring turns to The American Fall.

We're the 99, and we'll never forgive.
We'll never forget how you've made us live.
Expect us at your door, prepare to defend!
The reign of the moneyed and privileged now ends.

Once we were few; now we grow by the hour.
The lamb sheds its mask—the emperor cowers.
The wolf bares her teeth, her hunger devours,
The gleaming skyscrapers, the ivory towers.

We're the 99, and we'll never forgive.
We'll never forget how you've made us live.
Expect us at your door, prepare to defend!
The world of the moneyed and privileged now ends.

There's no "job creators", a "trickle-down" bust.
And time's running out for your greed and your lust.
You've earned no respect, and squandered our trust.
From this day forward, you must expect us!

We're the 99, and we'll never forgive.
We'll never forget how you've made us live.
Expect us at your door, prepare to defend!
The reign of the moneyed and privileged now ends.

-- by Bill Allyn (9/28/2011)

do you flick a bic? - NO MORE FLICKING! | plastics



"The BIC® Lighter is recognized as a worldwide leader in producing a safe, reliable flame for millions of consumers every day. In more than 160 countries around the world, BIC has sold more than 15 billion lighters."

Each day, BIC produces more than 5 million lighters worldwide.




FlickYourBic.com


bics & other "convenient" plastics kill - don't flick them!


photo by Chris Jordan
Midway: Message from the Gyre

On Midway Atoll, a remote cluster of islands more than 2000 miles from the nearest continent, the detritus of our mass consumption surfaces in an astonishing place: inside the stomachs of thousands of dead baby albatrosses. The nesting chicks are fed lethal quantities of plastic by their parents, who mistake the floating trash for food as they forage over the vast polluted Pacific Ocean.

For me, kneeling over their carcasses is like looking into a macabre mirror. These birds reflect back an appallingly emblematic result of the collective trance of our consumerism and runaway industrial growth. Like the albatross, we first-world humans find ourselves lacking the ability to discern anymore what is nourishing from what is toxic to our lives and our spirits. Choked to death on our waste, the mythical albatross calls upon us to recognize that our greatest challenge lies not out there, but in here.


Chris Jordan is an internationally acclaimed artist and cultural activist based in Seattle. His work explores contemporary mass culture from a variety of photographic and conceptual perspectives, connecting the viewer viscerally to the enormity and power of humanity’s collective will. Edge-walking the lines between art and activism, beauty and horror, abstraction and representation, the near and the far, the visible and the invisible, his work asks us to consider our own multi-layered roles in becoming more conscious stewards of our complex and embattled world. Jordan’s works are exhibited and published worldwide.


alternatives to flicking a bic

use matches! - zippos & lighter fluid, or at least refillable butane lighters



more on plastics


Plastic Pollution Coalition

Disposable plastics are the greatest source of plastic pollution. Plastic bags, straws, bottles, utensils, lids, cups and so many others offer a small convenience but remain forever. REFUSE disposable plastics! Follow the “4 Rs” of sustainable living: Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.


Coastal Issues / Coastal Care

WHEN THE MERMAIDS CRY:
THE GREAT PLASTIC TIDE



Nurdles covered beach. Photo Source: Algalita Foundation

By Claire Le Guern Lytle

The world population is living, working, vacationing, increasingly conglomerating along the coasts, and standing on the front row of the greatest, most unprecedented, plastic waste tide ever faced.

Washed out on our coasts in obvious and clearly visible form, the plastic pollution spectacle blatantly unveiling on our beaches is only the prelude of the greater story that unfolded further away in the the world’s oceans, yet mostly originating from where we stand: the land.

In 2008, our global plastic consumption worldwide has been estimated at 260 million tons. Plastic is versatile, lightweight, flexible, moisture resistant, strong, and relatively inexpensive. Those are the attractive qualities that lead us, around the world, to such a voracious appetite and over-consumption of plastic goods. However, durable and very slow to degrade, plastic materials that are used in the production of so many products all, ultimately, become waste with staying power. Our tremendous attraction to plastic, coupled with an undeniable behavioral propensity of increasingly over-consuming, discarding, littering and thus polluting, has become a combination of lethal nature...


more > Plastic Pollution | Coastal Care


AMRF Blog - Marine Plastic Covers Earth…Magazine


Ocean plastics made the cover of the February issue! And inside? An eight-page feature on the science of tracking plastic summarizes the most prominent marine debris research projects to date. Algalita gets first mention for Captain Charles Moore’s pioneering expeditions, plastic to plankton calculations and work raising awareness about plastic in the Pacific.

Author Barry E. DiGregorio provides an accessible and well-illustrated introduction to some of the field-defining scientific questions that Algalita and others are working hard to address: How much plastic is in the ocean? How long does it take for plastic to degrade at sea? What impact is it having on marine life?


Algalita Marine Research Foundation - Marine Research, Education and Restoration


Adverse Health Effects of Plastics | Fact Sheets | Ecology Center

In addition to creating safety problems during production, many chemical additives that give plastic products desirable performance properties also have negative environmental and human health effects. These effects include

• Direct toxicity, as in the cases of lead, cadmium, and mercury
• Carcinogens, as in the case of diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP)
• Endocrine disruption, which can lead to cancers, birth defects, immune system supression and developmental problems in children.

People are exposed to these chemicals not only during manufacturing, but also by using plastic packages, because some chemicals migrate from the plastic packaging to the foods they contain. Examples of plastics contaminating food have been reported with most plastic types, including Styrene from polystyrene, plasticizers from PVC, antioxidants from polyethylene, and Acetaldehyde from PET.

Among the factors controlling migration are the chemical structure of the migrants and the nature of the packaged food. In studies cited in Food Additives and Contaminants, LDPE, HDPE, and polypropylene bottles released measurable levels of BHT, Chimassorb 81, Irganox PS 800, Irganix 1076, and Irganox 1010 into their contents of vegetable oil and ethanol. Evidence was also found that acetaldehyde migrated out of PET and into water.
Recommendations

Find alternatives to plastic products whenever possible. Some specific suggestions:
• Buy food in glass or metal containers; avoid polycarbonate drinking bottles with Bisphenol A
• Avoid heating food in plastic containers, or storing fatty foods in plastic containers or plastic wrap.
• Do not give young children plastic teethers or toys
• Use natural fiber clothing, bedding and furniture
• Avoid all PVC and Styrene products



see also

• what next: plastic

what next: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch | 5 Gyres

what next: Plastic Soup - Pacific Garbage Dump


Thursday, February 2, 2012

"Gasland" Director Josh Fox Arrested | does your water catch on fire ??? - DOWN WITH FRACKING !!!



The Academy Award-nominated filmmaker Josh Fox was handcuffed and arrested Wednesday as he attempted to film a congressional hearing on the controversial natural gas drilling technique known as fracking, which the Environmental Protection Agency recently reported caused water contamination in Pavillion, Wyoming.



Fox directed the award-winning film, "Gasland," which documents the impact of fracking on communities across the United States, and is now working on a sequel. Fox says he was arrested after Republicans refused to allow him to film because he did not have the proper credentials. "We wanted to report on what happened [at the hearing]. I was not interested in disrupting that hearing. It was not a protest action," says Fox. "I was simply trying to do my job as a journalist and go in there and show to the American people what was transpiring in that hearing, so that down the line, as we know there will be a lot of challenges mounted to that [Pavillion, Wyoming] EPA report—and frankly, to the people in Pavillion, who have been sticking up for themselves and demanding an investigation into the groundwater contamination—and to make sure that people could view that in a larger forum than usually happens." [includes rush transcript]


"Gasland" Director Josh Fox Arrested at Congressional Hearing on Natural Gas Fracking

Democracy NOW!
A daily TV/radio news program, hosted by Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez, airing on over 900 stations, pioneering the largest community media collaboration in the United States.


does your water catch on fire ???


CAN YOU DO THIS WITH YOUR TAP WATER?


Dont drink this water



Gasland: A film by Josh Fox


GASLAND Trailer 2010

"The largest domestic natural gas drilling boom in history has swept across the United States. The Halliburton-developed drilling technology of "fracking" or hydraulic fracturing has unlocked a "Saudia Arabia of natural gas" just beneath us. But is fracking safe? When filmmaker Josh Fox is asked to lease his land for drilling, he embarks on a cross-country odyssey uncovering a trail of secrets, lies and contamination. A recently drilled nearby Pennsylvania town reports that residents are able to light their drinking water on fire. This is just one of the many absurd and astonishing revelations of a new country called GASLAND. Part verite travelogue, part expose, part mystery, part bluegrass banjo meltdown, part showdown."

GASLAND will be broadcast on HBO through 2012. To host a public screening in your community please click here. The DVD will be on sale in December 2010.

JOIN US IN GASLAND

We can't stop Fracking without you. Pick up the phone, send and e-mail, start an organization, show GASLAND... JUST DO SOMETHING!

The Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act (H.R. 1084), (S. 587)—was introduced to both houses of the the United States Congress on June 9, 2009, and aims to repeal the exemption for hydraulic fracturing in the Safe Drinking Water Act. It would require the energy industry to disclose the chemicals it mixes with the water and sand it pumps underground in the hydraulic fracturing process (also known as fracking), information that has largely been protected as trade secrets. Controversy surrounds the practice of hydraulic fracturing as a threat to drinking water supplies. The gas industry opposes the legislation.

The House bill was introduced by representatives Diana DeGette, D-Colo., Maurice Hinchey D-N.Y., and Jared Polis, D-Colo. The Senate version was introduced by senators Bob Casey, D-Pa., and Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

We can't stop Fracking without you. Pick up the phone, send and e-mail, start an organization, show GASLAND... JUST DO SOMETHING!

CONTACT YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS
AND LET THEM KNOW YOU SUPPORT THE FRAC ACT
FIND OUT ABOUT LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
IN YOUR AREA, SUPPORTING THE FRAC ACT
CHECK OUT ACTION ALERTS
IN YOUR AREA, AND SEE HOW YOU CAN GET INVOLVED TODAY
SHARE YOUR STORY
AND LET OTHERS KNOW ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL EXPERIENCES
DO IT!


Gasland: A film by Josh Fox | TAKE ACTION



DOWN WITH FRACKING !!!

see also > what next: Endangered Critters Beware | Fracking


Mitt Romney "Not Concerned" About The Poor






In case you missed it, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney isn’t all that concerned with the struggles facing poor people.

Romney let this gem slip in an interview yesterday morning suggesting that it was the Democrats job to worry about the poor.

Indeed.

In 2010 more than 4 million more women than men lived in poverty. Families headed by a single adult are more likely to be headed by women, and these female-headed families are at greater risk of poverty and deep poverty. 34.2% of families with a female householder where no husband is present were poor and 17% were living in deep poverty. So when Romney says he doesn’t care about the poor, he means specifically he doesn’t care about poor women.

It’s not just Romney. It’s the entire Republican party who spent the last year legislating on the backs of our most vulnerable. It started with Stupak-Pitts during the health care reform debate and has now evolved into an outright war on the ability of the poor to access health care services at all on both the state and the federal level. It’s expressed in the crusade to cripple health care reform and to take away any affordable family planning or cancer screening.

And they’ve even enlisted their surrogates. Just look at the Susan G. Komen Foundation.


Mitt Romney "Not Concerned" About The Poor | Care2 Causes



he also says he isn't concerned about the rich, because "they are doing just fine." ~ yikes! who could possibly want the guy as president? - well, i guess if you are rich he might sound okay (?) - but then, that doesn't say much about the rich!


Wednesday, February 1, 2012

whats up, recent | old nukes, new nukes, NO NUKES | occupy nuclear notes



working on a new page today -

what next: old nukes, new nukes, NO NUKES | occupy nuclear


the page is listed to the right, and will be updated as things progress :)


UPDATE: SEE whats up: OCCUPY NUCLEAR - New Nukes | February 9




recent at whats up RC'S NUCLEAR BLOG

Nuclear Socialism Strikes Again | Nukespeak
First Round: Entergy 1, Vermont 0 | ENTERGY | Nuke Waste Piles High | New Nukes
Deaths of ringed seals in Alaska | Fish Eaters
Nuclear Power: Risks and Consequences
whats up: No New Nukes! | FUKUSHIMA NOT "SHUT DOWN"



whats up: Nuclear Socialism Strikes Again | Nukespeak


The nuclear industry is all atwitter (in the ancient sense of the word) at the possibility that an American utility may soon receive permission to build the first new nuclear plants in more than 30 years...



whats up: First Round: Entergy 1, Vermont 0 | ENTERGY | Nuke Waste Piles High | New Nukes


Vermont Yankee News

Vermont Yankee
does the building look familiar?
- compare to Fukushima
its exactly the same style BWR as at Fukushima. There, the reactors for Units 1, 2, and 6 were supplied by General Electric, those for Units 3 and 5 by Toshiba, and Unit 4 by Hitachi. All six reactors were designed by General Electric.

- the first round in federal court has gone to Entergy, the electrical power production company that does not want to shut down its Vermont Yankee nuclear plant. The state of Vermont has been seeking to close the plant when its initial 40-year federal operating license expires on March 21.


more entergy

Entergy is the second-largest nuclear generator in the United States


Palisades atomic reactor "an accident waiting to happen"


A mountain of waste 70 years high and no solution in sight

There are over 100 operating nuclear power plants in America and 16 non-operational power plants, and a large number of nuclear fuel and weapons facilities. The more you know about these places, the more frightened you’ll be -- and should be!

Ever since the first self-sustaining chain reaction occurred on December 2, 1942, no solution has been found to deal with even the first cupful of radioactive waste generated in the US. Shortly, the Department of Energy's Blue Ribbon Commission will be releasing its report which will likely recommend so-called "Centralized Interim Storage" - effectively a parking lot dumpsite whose deadly cargo may never be moved to a "final" destination. Historically, Indian reservations or communities of color are the most likely targets to host such "storage." In addition, the DOE will likely begin a search for a new repository site to replace the wisely canceled and scientifically unsound proposed Yucca Mountain dump. The granite states appear to lead the list of possibilities although all of the 48 contiguous states are in the mix.


January 10, 2012: Renewable energy sources -- wind, water, solar and others -- passed nuclear generation as a share of U.S. power in September, according to the Energy Information Administration.

In the EIA’s latest report on energy sources and usage in the United States, which covers the nine months ended September, the nine-month total for both renewable production and consumption were higher than those for nuclear power.

...In the equivalent periods of 2010 and 2009, nuclear power was significantly ahead of renewables. In the first nine months of 2010, for example, nuclear generation produced 6.354 quads, while renewables produced 6.068 quads.


Retox / Vermont Yankee


For Sale: Quaint Vermont fixer-upper from the last millennium. Nestled on the bank of the Connecticut River, this antique nuclear reactor features cozy relations with federal regulators and the new governor is from just down the road!

TAKE ACTION:
Shut Down Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant



NO NUKES

Push for No New Nukes

TAKE ACTION: Help put an end to the NRC's rubber stamp!


who makes these things, anyway?

WESTINGHOUSE for one | FIRST NEW U.S. REACTORS IN DECADES



more > First Round: Entergy 1, Vermont 0 | ENTERGY | Nuke Waste Piles High | New Nukes


Feb. 2 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a vote for Feb. 9 on Southern Co.’s application for the first construction permit to build nuclear reactors in more than 30 years.

The NRC’s announcement, posted today on the agency’s website, is required seven days before a public meeting. The Nuclear Energy Institute expects the application to be approved, Marvin Fertel, chief executive officer of the Washington-based industry group, said Jan. 18 at a conference in Washington.

“The commissioners have the tools they need to issue” the license, Steve Higginbottom, a Southern spokesman, said in an e- mail.

Southern is planning to build two reactors at its Vogtle power plant, about 26 miles (42 kilometers) southeast of Augusta, Georgia. The Atlanta-based company said the first unit would be in operation by 2016 with the second reactor working a year later. Construction will cost about $14 billion.

The NRC also is considering a license for Scana Corp. of Cayce, South Carolina, to build two reactors at an existing plant, as the agency weighs new safety rules for the U.S. nuclear-power industry after Japan’s disaster last year. - NRC Advances Southern Co. Bid to Build U.S. Nuclear Units - Businessweek



coming soon: OCCUPY NUCLEAR -- notes --


want to help? - find your closest nuke plant(s), look up the type and status of the reactor(s) and/or other facilites; and find out who the owners & operators are. then we can talk about some organizing and actions! - who is already working on the nuclear issue in your area? - what next?
comment below, or email rc :)

watch for updates at whats up: OCCUPY NUCLEAR


see also:

Beyond Nuclear - FREEZE OUR FUKUSHIMAS - March Against Nuclear Madness!

March 2012 is “March Against Nuclear Madness” and Beyond Nuclear has created a new March Against Nuclear Madness Facebook page. We will be helping to coordinate, organize and promote events around the country throughout the month of March to commemorate the March 11, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe in Japan. We encourage you to post your events and ideas on this page.

We are inspired by the opposition to nuclear power in Japan where today only four of the country’s 54 nuclear power plants are still operating. As nuclear power plants there shut down for routine refueling, local government and citizen opposition are refusing to allow them to restart.

We are further inspired by the principled democratic action being taken in Vermont. Here in the United States, the nuclear industry and the federal government look to pre-empt a state’s right to self determination for an energy future in the public good. In Vermont, where the Fukushima-style Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant should have closed by a state legislative vote when its operating license expires on March 21, 2012, a lower court federal judge has ruled that Entergy can extend its nuclear madness by another 20 years – for now.



see also

whats up: RC'S NUCLEAR BLOG | whats up: Links


UPDATE: SEE whats up: OCCUPY NUCLEAR - New Nukes | February 9


List of nuclear power plants in America
Operating or closed. Including their individual histories, locations, technical details, official contact points, and local activist groups.

Nuclear power in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As of 2008, nuclear power in the United States is provided by 104 commercial reactors (69 pressurized water reactors and 35 boiling water reactors) licensed to operate at 65 nuclear power plants, producing a total of 806.2 TWh of electricity, which was 19.6% of the nation's total electric energy generation in 2008.[1] The United States is the world's largest supplier of commercial nuclear power.

Nuclear Information and Resource Service - NIRS

Beyond Nuclear - Home

Anti-nuclear groups in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Some sixty anti-nuclear power groups are operating, or have operated, in the United States. These include: Abalone Alliance, Clamshell Alliance, Greenpeace USA, Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Musicians United for Safe Energy, Nuclear Control Institute, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Public Citizen Energy Program, Shad Alliance, and the Sierra Club.

List of nuclear reactors - World Wide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- this is a really scary page... especially seeing how many are being built in China right now

Nuclear reactor accidents in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
According to a 2010 survey of energy accidents, there have been at least 56 accidents near nuclear reactors in the United States (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage). The most serious of these was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979. Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities.


NO NUKES | RE-TOOL NOW

what next: old nukes, new nukes, NO NUKES | occupy nuclear

Got Science? | climate deniers get my goat






Sean Hannity - FOX climate denier

Sean Hannity is failing science. When it comes to global warming, Sean doesn't play well with facts. Even worse, he's become a bad influence on his fellow students (and his viewers), replacing established scientific facts with his own talking points.

And he's not alone. Pundits and talking heads take to the airwaves virtually every day to promote bad science and distort the facts. They're not just failing science — they're failing their viewers, and it's up to the Union of Concerned Scientists and people like you to tell them that they aren't making the grade.

Take a look at Sean's failing grades below, and then send a note to his parent (company) and tell them to put Sean on time out until he's ready to get the science right.


SEND A LETTER TO FOX -

Dear Fox News,

Sean Hannity just can't get it right when it comes to global warming. Despite the worldwide consensus of climate scientists about the growing danger of human-created climate change, he continues to describe climate science as "a crock and a huge cover up."

Quite simply, Sean is failing science. By replacing established scientific facts with his own talking points, he is misleading your viewers and making it impossible for them to make informed judgements about climate change.

Tell Sean to stop talking about climate change until he can get his facts straight.


(link for Sean Hannity: Hannity with Sean Hannity - Fox News)


Dismal Science in Media

There is widespread consensus among climate scientists that the earth is warming and human activity is the main driver; However, a recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal gives voice to a handful of scientists, most without relevant expertise in climate science, who make misleading claims and dismiss global warming.
January 27, 2012: The Wall Street Journal today published an opinion piece from 16 scientists urging candidates for public office to ignore the looming threat of climate change. While it’s entirely appropriate for scientists, like all citizens, to voice their personal opinions on public policy, the op-ed repeated a number of deeply misleading claims about climate science.

To take just one example, the authors claim there has been a “lack of warming” for 10 years. Here’s what we know: 2011 was the 35th year in a row in which global temperatures were above the historical average and 2010 and 2005 were the warmest years on record. Over the past decade, record high temperatures outpaced record lows by more than two to one across the continental United States, a marked increase from previous decades.

So where should decision-makers and the public turn to understand what the vast majority of scientists with relevant expertise really think about climate change?


more > Dismal Science at the Wall Street Journal - The Equation

The Equation - a blog on independent science practical solutions (UCS)


see also > what next: climate deniers get my goat
A Letter to the Editor, Wall Street Journal, from a boatload of climate scientists - THANK YOU!

Do you consult your dentist about your heart condition? In science, as in any area, reputations are based on knowledge and expertise in a field and on published, peer-reviewed work. If you need surgery, you want a highly experienced expert in the field who has done a large number of the proposed operations...

...Research shows that more than 97% of scientists actively publishing in the field agree that climate change is real and human caused. It would be an act of recklessness for any political leader to disregard the weight of evidence and ignore the enormous risks that climate change clearly poses. In addition, there is very clear evidence that investing in the transition to a low-carbon economy will not only allow the world to avoid the worst risks of climate change, but could also drive decades of economic growth. Just what the doctor ordered.


more > what next: climate deniers get my goat



Union of Concerned Scientists
Independent Science, Practical Solutions
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.

What began as a collaboration between students and faculty members at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1969 is now an alliance of more than 250,000 citizens and scientists. UCS members are people from all walks of life: parents and businesspeople, biologists and physicists, teachers and students. Our achievements over the decades show that thoughtful action based on the best available science can help safeguard our future and the future of our planet.


UCS: | Union of Concerned Scientists


UCS Action Center - current action items


• Urge Federal Agencies to Let Scientists Speak Out

While federal government scientists play a critical role in protecting our health, safety, and environment, many report that they are often discouraged from sharing their scientific research and analysis with the media and the public. In fact, a Union of Concerned Scientists investigation found that the media policies and practices of some federal agencies effectively censor scientists, impeding their ability to discuss their work with their peers and with interested journalists who convey research findings to the public.

Other federal agencies—like NASA—have changed their policies to allow their scientists far greater freedom in meeting their public service missions, demonstrating that it is possible for the government to do better. Federal scientists must feel free to speak out about research findings that impact our lives.

Please urge federal agency leaders to improve their agencies' media policies and let government scientists speak out.
Act Now »


• Urge Congress to support local farms and food.

Tell Congress: Support the Local Farms, Food, and Jobs Act!

Currently, billions of taxpayer dollars subsidize unhealthy, processed foods, while farmers who grow healthy foods work without support—but we can change that!

Leaders in Congress have introduced the Local Farms, Food, and Jobs Act to support local farmers and food markets. A recent UCS report found that expanding local food systems will boost local economies, create jobs, and encourage consumption of fruits and vegetables. As a bonus, these farmers are also more likely to embrace practices that protect our air, water, and soil.

With enough support, this bill could become part of the larger Food and Farm Bill, currently moving through Congress at a lightning pace. Write to your members of Congress and ask them to cosponsor the Local Farms, Food, and Jobs Act today!

Act Now »


• Urge Obama administration to reduce global warming emissions.

Urge President Obama to Protect Public Health by Reducing Global Warming Emissions

Unchecked global warming could threaten public health and increase health costs by exacerbating ground-level ozone—the primary component of smog. Fortunately, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently crafting standards to curb global warming emissions from our nation’s dirtiest coal plants and oil refineries. These standards will help protect the public's health and our environment from the dangerous consequences of global warming.

However, the Obama administration is under enormous pressure from the coal and oil industries to release weak standards that will do little to nothing to protect our health and environment.

The Obama administration needs to hear from you that the oil and coal lobbyists don’t represent your interests and that you want our nation's environmental policies to be based on science—not on the disinformation of corporate lobbyists.

We know the vast majority of the public stands with us on this issue. But sometimes agreeing from the sidelines is not enough. This is a fight worth joining—a chance to step up and really make a difference.

Tell President Obama to protect the health of the American people by ensuring strong Clean Air Act standards that reduce global warming emissions.

Act Now »


• Urge Congress to Support Wind Power

Using more clean, renewable electricity from sources such as the sun and wind will increase our energy independence, save consumers money, and reduce our global warming emissions. One of the primary drivers of the growth in wind energy in the United States is the federal production tax credit (PTC), which gives developers tax incentives for generating energy from renewable sources.

Despite the PTC being one of the primary drivers of wind development, the federal government has allowed it to expire on three separate occasions since 1999. These lapses in the PTC led to a boom-bust cycle that drastically slowed the wind power industry for many months at a time.

The current PTC for wind power is set to expire at the end of 2012. The expiration of the PTC threatens one of the country's fastest growing clean energy industries and could put tens of thousands of Americans out of work.

Continued growth of wind energy through 2013 and beyond depends on passing the PTC well ahead of its expiration date.
Act Now »


Action Center | Union of Concerned Scientists


what next: climate deniers get my goat